abijah
|
4d123b63f0
|
Moved all grid elements onto the grid helper. Basic testing done, but more testing needs to be done.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/invoice_receipt_20090629/site@262 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-07-08 20:40:44 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
a88f5829ce
|
Moved the leases element onto the new grid helper.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/invoice_receipt_20090629/site@261 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-07-08 19:22:22 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
fbd43fbbb2
|
Cleaned up and got rid of the word Tenant in most places. The original thought was to minimize confusion in our specific case (since we don't sell POS items) by simply refering to customers as tenants. However, I don't think customers is a very confusing term and so I decided to clear up the inconsistency. I did leave it in a couple places, where the customers in questions are clearly tenants
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/invoice_receipt_20090629/site@222 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-07-06 03:34:33 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
73eacdbcf2
|
More changes. I just can't seem to come up with a solution that works that I like. The problem now, without invoice/receipt, is that one check cannot cleanly pay for two units.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/single_AR_20090622/site@182 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-06-24 00:33:39 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
009ea6b44d
|
Nowhere near done yet, but checking in a snapshot of semi-working code. There is some simultaneous support for both with and without use of the Invoice/Receipt account. I want to do away with them completely, but will need to change how sitelink payments are mapped (right now, they split a payment into multiple parts to match the charge).
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/single_AR_20090622/site@181 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-06-23 19:04:41 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
c9c06a9fb4
|
Updated all the view.ctp files to use the new style infobox. I should probably create an element for it, but I'll hold off for now.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/ledger_transactions_20090605/site@135 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-06-15 21:01:22 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
f08884f326
|
Finally added a format helper, which has been long intended. There may be still be conversion issues, it hasn't been tested much.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/ledger_transactions_20090605/site@77 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-06-08 03:32:07 +00:00 |
|
abijah
|
677458e942
|
I'm still in the middle of moving onto a ledger based system. However, I'm am now changing how transactions and entries relate back to the customer. I'll be using a ledger for each lease (for rent, late charges, security deposits, etc), and a ledger for each customer (for POS, non-specific deposits such as reservations or covering mulitple units, bad debt writeoff, and possibly customer credits, when not obviously lease specific). This coming change might not be in the right direction, so I want to capture the work as is right now. This change set is not fully functional. Many operations do work, but there are obviously transaction problems with units and customers.
git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/ledger_transactions_20090605/site@71 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83
|
2009-06-06 20:18:56 +00:00 |
|