abijah dfe20e7ef9 Finally, finally... a working version for payment entry. The current schema is working well, and seems to handle our technical needs. However, it does seem to be very confusing with the extra accounts. Nonetheless, it does work and so I'll keep going down this path. This checkin also includes a mechanism to close the books on an account (by closing the underlying ledger) and start a new ledger. One of the decisions worth revisiting is separating out ledger entries that are really part of the same transaction. Without this change, inspecting a transaction results in the transaction total being off by a factor of two, since all money movement is in their twice (once for the expected reason, and again to hit the invoice/receipt ledger). ...

git-svn-id: file:///svn-source/pmgr/branches/invoice_receipt_20090629/site@195 97e9348a-65ac-dc4b-aefc-98561f571b83

2009-07-01 08:17:31 +00:00

..

payment.ctp

Finally, finally... a working version for payment entry. The current schema is working well, and seems to handle our technical needs. However, it does seem to be very confusing with the extra accounts. Nonetheless, it does work and so I'll keep going down this path. This checkin also includes a mechanism to close the books on an account (by closing the underlying ledger) and start a new ledger. One of the decisions worth revisiting is separating out ledger entries that are really part of the same transaction. Without this change, inspecting a transaction results in the transaction total being off by a factor of two, since all money movement is in their twice (once for the expected reason, and again to hit the invoice/receipt ledger).

2009-07-01 08:17:31 +00:00

view.ctp

More changes. I just can't seem to come up with a solution that works that I like. The problem now, without invoice/receipt, is that one check cannot cleanly pay for two units.

2009-06-24 00:33:39 +00:00